Intel UHD Graphics versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 35% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 889 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 28.80 versus 9.2 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 33 Watt
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.059 versus 8.572
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 313.603 versus 151.304
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.345 versus 0.808
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.728 versus 13.943
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 269 versus 128
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1477 versus 636
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 21 Aug 2019 versus 1 April 2013 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 889 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.80 versus 9.2 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 33 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.059 versus 8.572 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 313.603 versus 151.304 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.345 versus 0.808 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.728 versus 13.943 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 269 versus 128 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1477 versus 636 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
- 2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 39.301 versus 28.67
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 384 versus 192 |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 39.301 versus 28.67 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.059 | 8.572 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 313.603 | 151.304 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.345 | 0.808 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.728 | 13.943 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.67 | 39.301 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 269 | 128 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1477 | 636 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3550 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1524 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1426 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2519 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1524 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1426 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2519 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler 2.0 |
Nom de code | Comet Lake GT2 | GK208 |
Date de sortie | 21 Aug 2019 | 1 April 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1186 | 1456 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 889 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.80 | 9.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 33 Watt |
Vitesse du noyau | 575 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 441.6 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |