NVIDIA GRID K2 versus NVIDIA Tesla K10
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GRID K2 and NVIDIA Tesla K10 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GRID K2
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
Date de sortie | 11 May 2013 versus 1 May 2012 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla K10
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 14029 versus 10550
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.736 versus 18.948
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 975.508 versus 968.568
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.39 versus 2.58
- 10.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3632 versus 344
- 10.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 312
- 10.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3632 versus 344
- 10.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 312
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14029 versus 10550 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.736 versus 18.948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 975.508 versus 968.568 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.39 versus 2.58 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3632 versus 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 312 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3632 versus 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 312 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K2
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K10
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GRID K2 | NVIDIA Tesla K10 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2737 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 319 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10550 | 14029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.948 | 40.736 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 968.568 | 975.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.58 | 3.39 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.988 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 114.144 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6371 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 344 | 3632 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 312 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6371 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 344 | 3632 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 312 | 3353 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GRID K2 | NVIDIA Tesla K10 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Nom de code | GK104 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 11 May 2013 | 1 May 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $5,199 | $5,099 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 975 | 978 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 745 MHz | 745 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2x 2,289 gflops | 2x 2,289 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 | 2x 1536 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec | 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 225 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 272 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2x 4 GB | 2x 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 2x 160.0 GB / s | 2x 160.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 2x 256 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |