NVIDIA Quadro K620 versus NVIDIA GRID K2
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA GRID K2 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 42% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1058 MHz versus 745 MHz
- 5.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 41 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 474 versus 319
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.112 versus 18.948
- 7.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2490 versus 344
- 10.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 versus 312
- 7.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2490 versus 344
- 10.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 versus 312
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 versus 11 May 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz versus 745 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 474 versus 319 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 versus 18.948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 versus 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 versus 312 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 versus 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 versus 312 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GRID K2
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 17.98 GTexel / s
- 8x plus de pipelines: 2x 1536 versus 384
- 5.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 2,289 gflops versus 863.2 gflops
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2x 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2737 versus 2231
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 10550 versus 6869
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 968.568 versus 297.631
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.58 versus 1.427
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.988 versus 15.363
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 114.144 versus 99.125
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6371 versus 2970
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6371 versus 2970
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 17.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 2x 2,289 gflops versus 863.2 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2x 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2737 versus 2231 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10550 versus 6869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 968.568 versus 297.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.58 versus 1.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.988 versus 15.363 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 114.144 versus 99.125 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6371 versus 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6371 versus 2970 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | NVIDIA GRID K2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2231 | 2737 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 474 | 319 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 | 10550 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 | 18.948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 | 968.568 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.427 | 2.58 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.363 | 32.988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 | 114.144 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 | 6371 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 | 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 312 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 | 6371 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 | 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 312 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro K620 | NVIDIA GRID K2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM107 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 | 11 May 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $189.89 | $5,199 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 974 | 975 |
Prix maintenant | $189.93 | |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.23 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz | 745 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 863.2 gflops | 2x 2,289 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 2x 1536 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.98 GTexel / s | 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt | 225 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP | No outputs |
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 160 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2x 4 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | 128 Bit | GDDR5 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 2x 160.0 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |