NVIDIA GRID K2 versus NVIDIA Tesla K20c
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GRID K2 and NVIDIA Tesla K20c pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GRID K2
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 745 MHz versus 706 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 146.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 23% de pipelines plus haut: 2x 1536 versus 2496
- Environ 30% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 2,289 gflops versus 3,524 gflops
- Environ 60% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 2x 4 GB versus 5 GB
| Date de sortie | 11 May 2013 versus 12 November 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 745 MHz versus 706 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 146.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 versus 2496 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 2,289 gflops versus 3,524 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2x 4 GB versus 5 GB |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla K20c
- Environ 4% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5200 MHz versus 5000 MHz
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15597 versus 10471
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.423 versus 18.943
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1427.15 versus 968.568
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.128 versus 2.51
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.383 versus 32.988
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 179.044 versus 114.144
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5200 MHz versus 5000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15597 versus 10471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.423 versus 18.943 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1427.15 versus 968.568 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.128 versus 2.51 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.383 versus 32.988 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 179.044 versus 114.144 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K2
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20c
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GRID K2 | NVIDIA Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2737 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 319 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10471 | 15597 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.943 | 39.423 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 968.568 | 1427.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.51 | 4.128 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.988 | 64.383 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 114.144 | 179.044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6371 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 344 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 312 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6371 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 344 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 312 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GRID K2 | NVIDIA Tesla K20c | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GK104 | GK110 |
| Date de sortie | 11 May 2013 | 12 November 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $5,199 | $3,199 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 975 | 976 |
| Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 745 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 2,289 gflops | 3,524 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 | 2496 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec | 146.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 7,080 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2x 4 GB | 5 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 2x 160.0 GB / s | 208.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 2x 256 Bit | 320 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GRID K2 avec des autres
NVIDIAGRID K2 vs
NVIDIAQuadro4 980 XGL
NVIDIAGRID K2 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 5000
NVIDIAGRID K2 vs
NVIDIATesla K10
NVIDIAGRID K2 vs
NVIDIATesla K20c
NVIDIAGRID K2 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K620
NVIDIAGRID K2 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient
