NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M versus NVIDIA GRID K520
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M and NVIDIA GRID K520 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 28% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 745 MHz
- Environ 84% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 122 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3814 versus 3516
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 330 versus 160
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15023 versus 10864
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.273 versus 20.97
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.914 versus 3.244
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 82.511 versus 76.158
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 versus 23 July 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 745 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt versus 225 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3814 versus 3516 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 330 versus 160 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 versus 10864 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.273 versus 20.97 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.914 versus 3.244 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 versus 76.158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3354 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GRID K520
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 127.1 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 2x 1536 versus 1536
- Environ 61% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 2,448 gflops versus 3,050 gflops
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1063.784 versus 777.677
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.277 versus 38.196
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6782 versus 4501
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6782 versus 4501
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 127.1 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 versus 1536 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 2,448 gflops versus 3,050 gflops |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.784 versus 777.677 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.277 versus 38.196 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6782 versus 4501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6782 versus 4501 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K520
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA GRID K520 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3814 | 3516 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 330 | 160 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 | 10864 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.273 | 20.97 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 777.677 | 1063.784 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.914 | 3.244 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.196 | 42.277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 | 76.158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 | 6782 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 | 6782 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3354 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA GRID K520 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GK104 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 737 | 738 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $3,599 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 993 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,050 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 2x 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 127.1 GTexel / s | 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 2x 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160.0 GB / s | 2x 160.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8550D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics P6300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
AMDRadeon 630
