NVIDIA GeForce 800M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 800M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 800M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 1% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1782 MHz
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.91 versus 2.907
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 17 March 2014 versus 24 April 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1782 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.91 versus 2.907 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 875 MHz versus 738 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 14 GTexel / s versus 5.904 GTexel / s
- 4x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 48
- 2.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 336.0 gflops versus 141.7 gflops
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 182.993 versus 109.13
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.65 versus 7.249
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 18.19 versus 15.218
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2029 versus 1123
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2029 versus 1123
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 875 MHz versus 738 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14 GTexel / s versus 5.904 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 versus 48 |
| Performance á point flottant | 336.0 gflops versus 141.7 gflops |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 182.993 versus 109.13 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.65 versus 7.249 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.19 versus 15.218 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2029 versus 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2029 versus 1123 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 800M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 800M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 477 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1303 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.91 | 2.907 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 109.13 | 182.993 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.249 | 7.65 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.218 | 18.19 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 703 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1123 | 2029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1601 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 703 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1123 | 2029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1601 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.475 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 800M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GF117 | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 17 March 2014 | 24 April 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1511 | 1514 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 738 MHz | 875 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 141.7 gflops | 336.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 192 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5.904 GTexel / s | 14 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 28.51 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 800M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 800M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 GS
NVIDIAGeForce 800M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce 800M vs
NVIDIANVS 5200M
NVIDIAGeForce 800M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce 800M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
NVIDIAGeForce 800M vs
IntelHD Graphics 510
