NVIDIA GeForce 940M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 940M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 940M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 75% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 28.22 GTexel / s versus 16.1 billion / sec
- 2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
- Environ 74% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 903.2 gflops versus 518.4 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 52% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 2 GB versus 1536 MB
- Environ 44% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5925 versus 4119
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.98 versus 11.121
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.307 versus 1.105
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.837 versus 18.548
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 101.399 versus 32.965
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2132 versus 1699
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3065 versus 2837
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2132 versus 1699
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3065 versus 2837
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 versus 3 September 2010 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.22 GTexel / s versus 16.1 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 384 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 903.2 gflops versus 518.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1536 MB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5925 versus 4119 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.98 versus 11.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.307 versus 1.105 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.837 versus 18.548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.399 versus 32.965 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 versus 1699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3065 versus 2837 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 versus 1699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3065 versus 2837 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3349 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
- Environ 26% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1350 MHz versus 1072 MHz
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1207 versus 1126
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 versus 154
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 391.548 versus 168.449
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz versus 1072 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1207 versus 1126 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 versus 154 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 391.548 versus 168.449 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 940M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1126 | 1207 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 154 | 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5925 | 4119 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.98 | 11.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 168.449 | 391.548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.307 | 1.105 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.837 | 18.548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.399 | 32.965 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 | 1699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3065 | 2837 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 | 1699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3065 | 2837 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce 940M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
Nom de code | GM108 | GF106 |
Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 | 3 September 2010 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1227 | 1230 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1072 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 903.2 gflops | 518.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.22 GTexel / s | 16.1 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 50 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,170 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 60.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Vision | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
SLI |