NVIDIA GeForce 940M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 940M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 940M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 75% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 28.22 GTexel / s versus 16.1 billion / sec
- 2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
- Environ 74% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 903.2 gflops versus 518.4 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 52% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 2 GB versus 1536 MB
- Environ 44% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5807 versus 4082
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.98 versus 11.121
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.307 versus 1.105
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.837 versus 18.548
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 101.399 versus 32.965
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2132 versus 1699
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3065 versus 2837
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2132 versus 1699
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3065 versus 2837
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 versus 3 September 2010 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.22 GTexel / s versus 16.1 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 192 |
| Performance á point flottant | 903.2 gflops versus 518.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1536 MB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5807 versus 4082 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.98 versus 11.121 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.307 versus 1.105 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.837 versus 18.548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.399 versus 32.965 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 versus 1699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3065 versus 2837 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 versus 1699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3065 versus 2837 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3349 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
- Environ 26% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1350 MHz versus 1072 MHz
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1243 versus 1123
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 259 versus 153
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 391.548 versus 168.449
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz versus 1072 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1243 versus 1123 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 259 versus 153 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 391.548 versus 168.449 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 940M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1123 | 1243 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 153 | 259 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5807 | 4082 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.98 | 11.121 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 168.449 | 391.548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.307 | 1.105 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.837 | 18.548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.399 | 32.965 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 | 1699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3065 | 2837 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 | 1699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3065 | 2837 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3349 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 940M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GM108 | GF106 |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 | 3 September 2010 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1222 | 1225 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1072 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 903.2 gflops | 518.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.22 GTexel / s | 16.1 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,170 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
| Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 60.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 940M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460M
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6370M
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 830M
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M460
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
IntelUHD Graphics 630
