NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 322 versus 319
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 77.99 versus 76.214
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.018 versus 5.862
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 555 versus 545
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 555 versus 545
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 April 2012 versus 13 April 2011 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 322 versus 319 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1283 versus 1277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 77.99 versus 76.214 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.018 versus 5.862 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 555 versus 545 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 555 versus 545 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
- 2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 810 MHz
- 900x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 900 MHz (DDR3) versus 1.8 GB/s
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 136 versus 131
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.597 versus 2.471
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.239 versus 0.233
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.574 versus 4.053
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 903 versus 835
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1455 versus 1155
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 903 versus 835
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1455 versus 1155
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz versus 810 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 155.52 gflops versus 155.5 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz (DDR3) versus 1.8 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 136 versus 131 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.597 versus 2.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.239 versus 0.233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.574 versus 4.053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 903 versus 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1455 versus 1155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 903 versus 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1455 versus 1155 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 322 | 319 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 131 | 136 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1283 | 1277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.471 | 2.597 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 77.99 | 76.214 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.233 | 0.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.018 | 5.862 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.053 | 4.574 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 555 | 545 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 835 | 903 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1155 | 1455 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 555 | 545 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 835 | 903 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1155 | 1455 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 87 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GF119 | GF119 |
| Date de sortie | 2 April 2012 | 13 April 2011 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $39.99 | $59 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1626 | 1603 |
| Prix maintenant | $39.99 | $59.99 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.13 | 7.58 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 48 | 48 |
| Performance á point flottant | 155.5 gflops | 155.52 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 102 °C | 102 °C |
| Pipelines | 48 | 48 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 6.5 billion / sec | 6.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt | 29 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 292 million | 292 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | Internal |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-IHDMIVGA (optional) |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
| Hauteur | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | 2.7" (6.9 cm) |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1024 MB | 1 GB (DDR3) |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | 900 MHz (DDR3) |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||


