NVIDIA Quadro 410 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro 410 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 410
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 192 versus 144
- Environ 7% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 271.1 gflops versus 253.4 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 219 versus 171
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.393 versus 5.332
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 919 versus 800
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 919 versus 800
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 August 2012 versus 22 March 2012 |
| Pipelines | 192 versus 144 |
| Performance á point flottant | 271.1 gflops versus 253.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 219 versus 171 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.393 versus 5.332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 919 versus 800 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 919 versus 800 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
- Environ 9% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 38 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 1 GB versus 512 MB
- Environ 1% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1782 MHz
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 558 versus 438
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2537 versus 1446
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 205.545 versus 126.006
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.932 versus 5.685
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.728 versus 8.847
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1833 versus 1311
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2418 versus 1794
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1833 versus 1311
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2418 versus 1794
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 38 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 1 GB versus 512 MB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1782 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 558 versus 438 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2537 versus 1446 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 205.545 versus 126.006 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.932 versus 5.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.728 versus 8.847 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1833 versus 1311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 versus 1794 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1833 versus 1311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 versus 1794 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 410
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro 410 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 438 | 558 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 219 | 171 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1446 | 2537 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.393 | 5.332 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 126.006 | 205.545 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.685 | 10.932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.847 | 22.728 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 919 | 800 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1311 | 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1794 | 2418 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 919 | 800 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1311 | 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1794 | 2418 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro 410 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GK107 | GF116 |
| Date de sortie | 7 August 2012 | 22 March 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1460 | 1461 |
| Prix maintenant | $272.28 | |
| Genre | Workstation | Laptop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 1.70 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 706 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 271.1 gflops | 253.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 144 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 11.3 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 38 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 1,170 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 753 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | Up to 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 176 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 512 MB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.26 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1782 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro 410 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro 410 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6370D IGP
NVIDIAQuadro 410 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7350 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro 410 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 635M
NVIDIAQuadro 410 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 735M
NVIDIAQuadro 410 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
NVIDIAQuadro 410 vs
IntelHD Graphics 5300
