NVIDIA Quadro 410 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro 410 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 410
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 192 versus 144
- Environ 7% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 271.1 gflops versus 253.4 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 219 versus 170
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.393 versus 5.332
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 919 versus 800
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 919 versus 800
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 August 2012 versus 22 March 2012 |
Pipelines | 192 versus 144 |
Performance á point flottant | 271.1 gflops versus 253.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 219 versus 170 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.393 versus 5.332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 919 versus 800 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 919 versus 800 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
- Environ 9% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 38 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 1 GB versus 512 MB
- Environ 1% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1782 MHz
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 560 versus 438
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2544 versus 1446
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 205.545 versus 126.006
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.932 versus 5.685
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.728 versus 8.847
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1833 versus 1311
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2418 versus 1794
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1833 versus 1311
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2418 versus 1794
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 38 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 1 GB versus 512 MB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1782 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 560 versus 438 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2544 versus 1446 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 205.545 versus 126.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.932 versus 5.685 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.728 versus 8.847 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1833 versus 1311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 versus 1794 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1833 versus 1311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 versus 1794 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 410
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro 410 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 438 | 560 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 219 | 170 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1446 | 2544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.393 | 5.332 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 126.006 | 205.545 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.685 | 10.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.847 | 22.728 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 919 | 800 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1311 | 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1794 | 2418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 919 | 800 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1311 | 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1794 | 2418 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro 410 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | GK107 | GF116 |
Date de sortie | 7 August 2012 | 22 March 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1461 | 1462 |
Prix maintenant | $272.28 | |
Genre | Workstation | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 1.70 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 706 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 271.1 gflops | 253.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 144 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 11.3 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 38 Watt | 35 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 1,170 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 753 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | Up to 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 176 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 512 MB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.26 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1782 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |