NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 14% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 336
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 32 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 2 GB versus 1536 MB
- Environ 20% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- 5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1476 versus 296
- 4.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1963 versus 475
- 3.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2580 versus 657
- 5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1476 versus 296
- 4.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1963 versus 475
- 3.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2580 versus 657
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 versus 28 June 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 336 |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1536 MB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1476 versus 296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1963 versus 475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2580 versus 657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1476 versus 296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1963 versus 475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2580 versus 657 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
- Environ 61% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 772.8 gflops versus 480.0 gflops
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1864 versus 925
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 358 versus 199
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5696 versus 3184
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.911 versus 7.861
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 533.677 versus 275.972
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.681 versus 0.727
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.229 versus 15.445
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 66.187 versus 17.381
| Caractéristiques | |
| Performance á point flottant | 772.8 gflops versus 480.0 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1864 versus 925 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 358 versus 199 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5696 versus 3184 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 versus 7.861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 533.677 versus 275.972 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.681 versus 0.727 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.229 versus 15.445 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.187 versus 17.381 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 925 | 1864 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 199 | 358 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3184 | 5696 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.861 | 14.911 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 275.972 | 533.677 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.727 | 1.681 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.445 | 31.229 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.381 | 66.187 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1476 | 296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1963 | 475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2580 | 657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1476 | 296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1963 | 475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2580 | 657 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GK107 | GF114 |
| Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 | 28 June 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1346 | 1349 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 645 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 384 | 336 |
| Performance á point flottant | 480.0 gflops | 772.8 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 336 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 1,950 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 575 MHz | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 32.2 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
| Options SLI | 2-way | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 72.0 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 510 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M vs
AMDFirePro V3900
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M LE
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8350G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8550 OEM
