NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M versus NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M and NVIDIA Quadro 2000M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M

versus

NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
Environ 14% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 480.0 gflops versus 422.4 gflops
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
Environ 72% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 32 Watt versus 55 Watt
Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 931 versus 766
Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 275.972 versus 272.707
Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.445 versus 14.423
Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1476 versus 1261
Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1963 versus 1926
Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1476 versus 1261
Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1963 versus 1926

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	22 March 2012 versus 13 January 2011
Pipelines	384 versus 192
Performance á point flottant	480.0 gflops versus 422.4 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm versus 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	32 Watt versus 55 Watt
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	931 versus 766
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	275.972 versus 272.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	15.445 versus 14.423
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1476 versus 1261
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1963 versus 1926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2580 versus 2569
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1476 versus 1261
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1963 versus 1926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2580 versus 2569

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 231 versus 204
Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3424 versus 3185
Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.306 versus 7.861
Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.855 versus 0.727
Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.158 versus 17.381

Référence
PassMark - G2D Mark	231 versus 204
Geekbench - OpenCL	3424 versus 3185
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.306 versus 7.861
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.855 versus 0.727
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	27.158 versus 17.381

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

931

766

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

204

231

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

3185

3424

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7.861

8.306

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

275.972

272.707

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.727

0.855

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15.445

14.423

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

17.381

27.158

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1476

1261

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1963

1926

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2580

2569

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1476

1261

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1963

1926

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2580

2569

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M	NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	931	766
PassMark - G2D Mark	204	231
Geekbench - OpenCL	3185	3424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	7.861	8.306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	275.972	272.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.727	0.855
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	15.445	14.423
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	17.381	27.158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1476	1261
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1963	1926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2580	2569
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1476	1261
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1963	1926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2580	2569

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M	NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Essentiel
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Nom de code	GK107	GF106
Date de sortie	22 March 2012	13 January 2011
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1351	1354
Genre	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Prix de sortie (MSRP)		$46.56
Prix maintenant		$46.56
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)		25.92
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	645 MHz
Noyaux CUDA	384
Performance á point flottant	480.0 gflops	422.4 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	384	192
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	32 Watt	55 Watt
Compte de transistor	1,270 million	1,170 million
Vitesse du noyau		550 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture		17.6 GTexel / s
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Résolution VGA maximale	Up to 2048x1536
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Soutien de bus	PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Taille du laptop	medium sized	medium sized
Soutien API
DirectX	12 API	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	1.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Mémoire
RAM maximale	2 GB	2 GB
Largeur du bus mémoire	128bit	128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	1800 MHz	1800 MHz
Genre de mémoire	DDR3\GDDR5	DDR3
Mémoire partagé	0	0
Bande passante de la mémoire		28.8 GB / s
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11	DirectX 11
Optimus