NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Around 14% higher pipelines: 384 vs 336
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
• Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1476 vs 296
• 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1963 vs 475
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2580 vs 657
• 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1476 vs 296
• 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1963 vs 475
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2580 vs 657

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M

• Around 61% better floating-point performance: 772.8 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1864 vs 925
• Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 358 vs 199
• Around 79% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5696 vs 3184
• Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.911 vs 7.861
• Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 533.677 vs 275.972
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.681 vs 0.727
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.229 vs 15.445
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 66.187 vs 17.381

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	925 1864
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	199 358
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3184 5696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.861 14.911
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	275.972 533.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.727 1.681
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.445 31.229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.381 66.187
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1476 296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1963 475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2580 657
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1476 296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1963 475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2580 657

Compare specifications (specs)