NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M versus NVIDIA Tesla M2070
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M and NVIDIA Tesla M2070 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 32 Watt versus 225 Watt
| Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 versus 25 July 2011 |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla M2070
- Environ 17% de pipelines plus haut: 448 versus 384
- 2.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,030.4 gflops versus 480.0 gflops
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 74% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 3132 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.145 versus 7.861
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 910.236 versus 275.972
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.005 versus 0.727
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 46.235 versus 15.445
- 5.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 94.442 versus 17.381
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 448 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,030.4 gflops versus 480.0 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3132 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.145 versus 7.861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 910.236 versus 275.972 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.005 versus 0.727 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.235 versus 15.445 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.442 versus 17.381 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2070
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M | NVIDIA Tesla M2070 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 928 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3192 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.861 | 12.145 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 275.972 | 910.236 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.727 | 1.005 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.445 | 46.235 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.381 | 94.442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1476 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1963 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2580 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1476 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1963 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2580 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M | NVIDIA Tesla M2070 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GK107 | GF100 |
| Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1358 | 1359 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $3,099 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 645 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 480.0 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 3,100 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 574 MHz | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 32.2 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Longeur | 248 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 150.3 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3800
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5650
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M vs
NVIDIATesla M2070
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M vs
IntelHD Graphics 4600
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8
