Intel HD Graphics 4600 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 4600 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 94% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1250 MHz versus 645 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 315 versus 195
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3232 versus 3190
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.844 versus 7.861
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 versus 0.727
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 versus 2580
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 versus 2580
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 versus 22 March 2012 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz versus 645 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 315 versus 195 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3232 versus 3190 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 versus 7.861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 versus 0.727 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 versus 2580 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 versus 2580 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
- 19.2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 20
- 9.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 480.0 gflops versus 50 gflops
- Environ 41% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 32 Watt versus 45 Watt
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 919 versus 629
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 275.972 versus 171.17
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.445 versus 10.385
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 17.381 versus 12.361
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1476 versus 988
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1963 versus 1702
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1476 versus 988
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1963 versus 1702
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 20 |
| Performance á point flottant | 480.0 gflops versus 50 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt versus 45 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 919 versus 629 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 275.972 versus 171.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.445 versus 10.385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.381 versus 12.361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1476 versus 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1963 versus 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1476 versus 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1963 versus 1702 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 629 | 919 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 315 | 195 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3232 | 3190 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | 7.861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | 275.972 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | 0.727 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | 15.445 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | 17.381 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | 1476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | 1963 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | 2580 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | 1476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | 1963 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | 2580 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Haswell GT2 | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 | 22 March 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1354 | 1341 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | 645 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 400 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 50 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 20 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 32 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 392 million | 1,270 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3\GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 4600 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8800 GT
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7050 + nForce 610i
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3800
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8400 IGP
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8
