NVIDIA Quadro K1100M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K1100M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
Environ 82% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 22.59 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s
4x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 96
2.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 542.2 gflops versus 240.0 gflops
Environ 75% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2800 MHz versus 1600 MHz
2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1088 versus 461
2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 versus 119
Environ 12% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2925 versus 2603
Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.649 versus 6.901
Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 174.555 versus 146.913
Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.642 versus 0.587
Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.732 versus 10.121
Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1892 versus 1047
Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1892 versus 1047

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	23 July 2013 versus 1 April 2013
Taux de remplissage de la texture	22.59 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 versus 96
Performance á point flottant	542.2 gflops versus 240.0 gflops
Vitesse de mémoire	2800 MHz versus 1600 MHz
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	1088 versus 461
PassMark - G2D Mark	253 versus 119
Geekbench - OpenCL	2925 versus 2603
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.649 versus 6.901
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	174.555 versus 146.913
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.642 versus 0.587
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	11.732 versus 10.121
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1892 versus 1047
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1892 versus 1047

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M

Environ 10% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 775 MHz versus 706 MHz
Environ 36% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 45 Watt
Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.755 versus 16.3
3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2570 versus 861
Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2035 versus 1443
3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2570 versus 861
Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2035 versus 1443

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	775 MHz versus 706 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	33 Watt versus 45 Watt
Référence
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	22.755 versus 16.3
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2570 versus 861
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2035 versus 1443
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2570 versus 861
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2035 versus 1443

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1088

461

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

253

119

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2925

2603

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8.649

6.901

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

174.555

146.913

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.642

0.587

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11.732

10.121

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16.3

22.755

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1892

1047

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

861

2570

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1443

2035

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1892

1047

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

861

2570

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1443

2035

Nom	NVIDIA Quadro K1100M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1088	461
PassMark - G2D Mark	253	119
Geekbench - OpenCL	2925	2603
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.649	6.901
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	174.555	146.913
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.642	0.587
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	11.732	10.121
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	16.3	22.755
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1892	1047
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	861	2570
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1443	2035
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1892	1047
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	861	2570
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1443	2035
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA Quadro K1100M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
Essentiel
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi 2.0
Nom de code	GK107	GF117
Date de sortie	23 July 2013	1 April 2013
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$109.94
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1440	1442
Prix maintenant	$79
Genre	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)	17.59
Infos techniques
Vitesse du noyau	706 MHz	775 MHz
Performance á point flottant	542.2 gflops	240.0 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	96
Taux de remplissage de la texture	22.59 GTexel / s	12.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt	33 Watt
Compte de transistor	1,270 million	585 million
Vitesse augmenté		938 MHz
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++)		Up to 2560x1600
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2		Up to 2560x1600
Protection du contenu HDCP
HDMI
Support du signale LVDS		Up to 1920x1200
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Taille du laptop	medium sized	medium sized
Soutien de bus		PCI Express 2.0
Soutien API
DirectX	12	12 API
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model	5
Vulkan
OpenCL		1.1
Mémoire
RAM maximale	2 GB	2 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	44.8 GB / s	12.8 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	128 Bit	64 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	2800 MHz	1600 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	DDR3
Mémoire partagé	0	0
Configuration standard de la mémoire		DDR3
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder