NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 versus AMD Radeon R7 250X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and AMD Radeon R7 250X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 63% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 49 Watt versus 80 Watt
Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 versus 13 February 2014 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt versus 80 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 250X
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 38 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 384
- Environ 76% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,216 gflops versus 692.7 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 2% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1625 MHz versus 1600 MHz
- 2.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2269 versus 830
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 637 versus 253
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 32.22 versus 10.872
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 638.532 versus 166.832
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.963 versus 0.817
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.987 versus 12.415
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.963 versus 36.916
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3916 versus 1951
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 versus 1693
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3324
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3916 versus 1951
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 versus 1693
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3324
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 38 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,216 gflops versus 692.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1625 MHz versus 1600 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2269 versus 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 637 versus 253 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.22 versus 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.532 versus 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.963 versus 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.987 versus 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.963 versus 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3916 versus 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3916 versus 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3324 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | AMD Radeon R7 250X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 2269 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 637 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 32.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 638.532 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 2.963 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 51.987 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 151.963 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 3916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 3916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | AMD Radeon R7 250X | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | GF108 | Cape Verde |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 | 13 February 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59.99 | $99 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1311 | 659 |
Prix maintenant | $54.99 | $260.70 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.48 | 11.25 |
Conception | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops | 1,216 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.43 GTexel / s | 38 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 80 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,500 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 640 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | 210 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1 x 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | 96 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | 1625 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |