NVIDIA Quadro K1100M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K1100M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 23% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 706 MHz versus 575 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 22.59 GTexel / s versus 9.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 23% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 542.2 gflops versus 441.6 gflops
- Environ 56% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2800 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1088 versus 653
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 versus 129
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.649 versus 8.572
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 174.555 versus 151.304
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1892 versus 1524
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1892 versus 1524
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 versus 1 April 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 706 MHz versus 575 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 22.59 GTexel / s versus 9.2 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 542.2 gflops versus 441.6 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2800 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1088 versus 653 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 versus 129 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.649 versus 8.572 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 174.555 versus 151.304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1892 versus 1524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1892 versus 1524 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
- Environ 36% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 45 Watt
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3687 versus 3034
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.808 versus 0.642
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.943 versus 11.732
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 39.301 versus 16.3
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1426 versus 861
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2519 versus 1443
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1426 versus 861
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2519 versus 1443
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 45 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3687 versus 3034 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.808 versus 0.642 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.943 versus 11.732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 39.301 versus 16.3 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1426 versus 861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2519 versus 1443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1426 versus 861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2519 versus 1443 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K1100M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1088 | 653 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 129 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3034 | 3687 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.649 | 8.572 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 174.555 | 151.304 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.642 | 0.808 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.732 | 13.943 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.3 | 39.301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1892 | 1524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 861 | 1426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1443 | 2519 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1892 | 1524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 861 | 1426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1443 | 2519 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro K1100M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GK107 | GK208 |
| Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 | 1 April 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109.94 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1440 | 1443 |
| Prix maintenant | $79 | |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.59 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 706 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 542.2 gflops | 441.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 22.59 GTexel / s | 9.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 889 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 44.8 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro K1100M avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 735M
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 720M
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8400E
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M230
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810M
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M360
