NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 980 MHz versus 888 MHz
- 2.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 130 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 2 GB versus 1536 MB
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 versus 22 August 2012 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 980 MHz versus 888 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 130 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1536 MB |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 versus 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 versus 3325 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
- Environ 2% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 823 MHz versus 810 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 85.25 GTexel / s versus 15.68 GTexel / s
- 3x plus de pipelines: 1152 versus 384
- 2.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,046 gflops versus 752.6 gflops
- 3.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5600 MHz versus 1802 MHz
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 32.718 versus 9.392
- 6.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1021.371 versus 157.479
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.143 versus 0.864
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 56.509 versus 16.101
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 67.697 versus 44.77
- 3.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5983 versus 1589
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3665 versus 3235
- 3.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5983 versus 1589
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3665 versus 3235
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 823 MHz versus 810 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 85.25 GTexel / s versus 15.68 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1152 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,046 gflops versus 752.6 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5600 MHz versus 1802 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.718 versus 9.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1021.371 versus 157.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.143 versus 0.864 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 56.509 versus 16.101 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.697 versus 44.77 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5983 versus 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3665 versus 3235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5983 versus 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3665 versus 3235 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 793 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3866 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.392 | 32.718 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.479 | 1021.371 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.864 | 3.143 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.101 | 56.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.77 | 67.697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1589 | 5983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3235 | 3665 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1589 | 5983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3235 | 3665 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 3325 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 345 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GK107 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 | 22 August 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1301 | 811 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 980 MHz | 888 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 752.6 gflops | 2,046 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1152 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.68 GTexel / s | 85.25 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 134.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1802 MHz | 5600 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 285M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
NVIDIAQuadro 4000M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7660G IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K610M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
AMDRadeon R5 235 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M240
