NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
3.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 170 Watt
300.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1802 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s

Date de sortie	1 April 2013 versus 10 May 2012
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt versus 170 Watt
Vitesse de mémoire	1802 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670

Environ 21% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 810 MHz
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 102.5 billion / sec versus 15.68 GTexel / s
3.5x plus de pipelines: 1344 versus 384
3.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,459.5 gflops versus 752.6 gflops
6.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5345 versus 793
3.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 537 versus 149
4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15511 versus 3866
4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.613 versus 9.392
6.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 971.208 versus 157.479
5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.281 versus 0.864
2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.404 versus 16.101
Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 86.208 versus 44.77
4.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7038 versus 1589
Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3686 versus 3235
Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 versus 3339
4.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7038 versus 1589
Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3686 versus 3235
Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 versus 3339
5.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1839 versus 345

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	980 MHz versus 810 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	102.5 billion / sec versus 15.68 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1344 versus 384
Performance á point flottant	2,459.5 gflops versus 752.6 gflops
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	5345 versus 793
PassMark - G2D Mark	537 versus 149
Geekbench - OpenCL	15511 versus 3866
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	41.613 versus 9.392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	971.208 versus 157.479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.281 versus 0.864
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	40.404 versus 16.101
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	86.208 versus 44.77
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7038 versus 1589
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3686 versus 3235
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361 versus 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7038 versus 1589
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3686 versus 3235
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361 versus 3339
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1839 versus 345

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

793

5345

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

149

537

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

3866

15511

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9.392

41.613

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

157.479

971.208

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.864

4.281

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16.101

40.404

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

44.77

86.208

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1589

7038

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3235

3686

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3339

3361

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1589

7038

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3235

3686

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3339

3361

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

345

1839

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
PassMark - G3D Mark	793	5345
PassMark - G2D Mark	149	537
Geekbench - OpenCL	3866	15511
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	9.392	41.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	157.479	971.208
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.864	4.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	16.101	40.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	44.77	86.208
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1589	7038
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3235	3686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3339	3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1589	7038
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3235	3686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3339	3361
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	345	1839

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
Essentiel
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Nom de code	GK107	GK104
Date de sortie	1 April 2013	10 May 2012
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1301	554
Genre	Laptop	Desktop
Prix de sortie (MSRP)		$399
Prix maintenant		$474.99
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)		13.20
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	980 MHz	980 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	810 MHz	980 MHz
Performance á point flottant	752.6 gflops	2,459.5 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	1344
Taux de remplissage de la texture	15.68 GTexel / s	102.5 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt	170 Watt
Compte de transistor	1,270 million	3,540 million
Noyaux CUDA		1344
Température maximale du GPU		97 °C
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++)	Up to 3840x2160
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2	Up to 3840x2160
Protection du contenu HDCP
HDMI
Support du signale LVDS	Up to 1920x1200
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA	Up to 2048x1536
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI		Internal
Soutien de G-SYNC
HDCP
Résolution VGA maximale		2048x1536
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Soutien de bus	PCI Express 3.0	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Taille du laptop	medium sized
Hauteur		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Longeur		9.5" (24.1 cm)
Options SLI		3-way
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires		Two 6-pin
Soutien API
DirectX	12 API	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	1.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.2
Mémoire
RAM maximale	2 GB	2 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	14.4 GB / s	192.2 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 / 128 Bit	256-bit GDDR5
Vitesse de mémoire	1802 MHz	6.0 GB/s
Genre de mémoire	DDR3	GDDR5
Mémoire partagé	0
Configuration standard de la mémoire	DDR3 / GDDR5
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
Adaptive VSync
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA