NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q versus AMD Radeon HD 7850
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon HD 7850 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 42% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1417 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 24% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 68.02 GTexel / s versus 55.04 GTexel / s
- Environ 24% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,177 gflops versus 1,761 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 225 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 5.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5368 versus 3856
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.188 versus 47.041
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1159.046 versus 1028.005
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.507 versus 4.41
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.067 versus 72.975
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 293.638 versus 249.482
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8059 versus 6173
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8059 versus 6173
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2219 versus 1312
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 3 January 2018 versus 5 March 2012 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1417 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 68.02 GTexel / s versus 55.04 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 2,177 gflops versus 1,761 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5368 versus 3856 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.188 versus 47.041 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1159.046 versus 1028.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.507 versus 4.41 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.067 versus 72.975 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 293.638 versus 249.482 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8059 versus 6173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8059 versus 6173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2219 versus 1312 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7850
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 1024 versus 768
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 561 versus 355
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3696 versus 3579
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3696 versus 3579
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 1024 versus 768 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 561 versus 355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3696 versus 3579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3696 versus 3579 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7850
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon HD 7850 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5368 | 3856 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 | 561 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18143 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.188 | 47.041 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1159.046 | 1028.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.507 | 4.41 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.067 | 72.975 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 293.638 | 249.482 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8059 | 6173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3579 | 3696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8059 | 6173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3579 | 3696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2219 | 1312 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon HD 7850 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | GP107 | Pitcairn |
Date de sortie | 3 January 2018 | 5 March 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 521 | 526 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $249 | |
Prix maintenant | $449.59 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 11.01 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1417 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1152 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 2,177 gflops | 1,761 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 1024 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 68.02 GTexel / s | 55.04 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 2,800 million |
Stream Processors | 1200 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Longeur | 210 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.1 GB / s | 153.6 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync |