NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 10% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1152 MHz versus 1046 MHz
- Environ 31% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1417 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 230 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.188 versus 49.824
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1159.046 versus 1089.67
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.507 versus 4.899
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.067 versus 44.06
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 293.638 versus 103.884
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8059 versus 7412
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3340
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8059 versus 7412
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3340
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2219 versus 2138
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 3 January 2018 versus 30 May 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1152 MHz versus 1046 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1417 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 230 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.188 versus 49.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1159.046 versus 1089.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.507 versus 4.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.067 versus 44.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 293.638 versus 103.884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8059 versus 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8059 versus 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2219 versus 2138 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
- Environ 97% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 134 billion / sec versus 68.02 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 768
- Environ 53% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,333 gflops versus 2,177 gflops
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5926 versus 5368
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 560 versus 355
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 18372 versus 18143
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 versus 3579
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 versus 3579
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 134 billion / sec versus 68.02 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 768 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,333 gflops versus 2,177 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7012 MHz versus 7008 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5926 versus 5368 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 560 versus 355 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18372 versus 18143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 versus 3579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 versus 3579 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5368 | 5926 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 | 560 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18143 | 18372 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.188 | 49.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1159.046 | 1089.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.507 | 4.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.067 | 44.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 293.638 | 103.884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8059 | 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3579 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8059 | 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3579 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2219 | 2138 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GP107 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 3 January 2018 | 30 May 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 521 | 524 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Prix maintenant | $449.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.45 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1417 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1152 MHz | 1046 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,177 gflops | 3,333 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 68.02 GTexel / s | 134 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 3,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 600 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.1 GB / s | 224.3 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | 7012 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce 205 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 560
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX
