NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 50% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1020 MHz
- Environ 39% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1245 MHz
- Environ 98% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 138.0 GTexel/s versus 69.72 GTexel/s
- Environ 43% de pipelines plus haut: 1280 versus 896
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10180 versus 6222
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 versus 326
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 55838 versus 36290
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.014 versus 129.465
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1961.932 versus 1047.553
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.169 versus 7.88
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 109.29 versus 78.563
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 787.025 versus 346.529
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 versus 8824
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 versus 8824
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 Nov 2019 versus 23 April 2019 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 1020 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1245 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 138.0 GTexel/s versus 69.72 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 1280 versus 896 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10180 versus 6222 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 versus 326 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55838 versus 36290 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.014 versus 129.465 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1961.932 versus 1047.553 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.169 versus 7.88 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 109.29 versus 78.563 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 787.025 versus 346.529 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 versus 8824 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 versus 8824 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3352 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- 2.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 100 Watt
- 8.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2954 versus 352
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 100 Watt |
| Référence | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2954 versus 352 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10180 | 6222 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 | 326 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55838 | 36290 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.014 | 129.465 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1961.932 | 1047.553 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.169 | 7.88 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 109.29 | 78.563 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 787.025 | 346.529 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 | 8824 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 | 8824 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3352 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 352 | 2954 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU116 | TU117 |
| Date de sortie | 22 Nov 2019 | 23 April 2019 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 283 | 447 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1245 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | 69.72 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) | 4.462 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.416 TFLOPS | 2.231 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 896 |
| Pixel fill rate | 55.20 GPixel/s | 39.84 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 138.0 GTexel/s | 69.72 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 4700 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9 inches (229 mm) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
| Largeur | Dual-slot | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
ATIFirePro RG220
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 485M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon R9 290X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX 590
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M
