NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1140 MHz versus 1046 MHz
- Environ 23% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1335 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 128.2 GTexel/s versus 134 billion / sec
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 230 Watt
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8609 versus 5939
- 2.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 52263 versus 18068
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.93 versus 49.824
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1919.95 versus 1089.67
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.6 versus 4.899
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.964 versus 44.06
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 492.867 versus 103.884
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 versus 7412
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3690
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3340
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 versus 7412
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3690
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3340
- 2.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4903 versus 2155
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2019 versus 30 May 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1140 MHz versus 1046 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1335 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.2 GTexel/s versus 134 billion / sec |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 230 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8609 versus 5939 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 52263 versus 18068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 versus 49.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 versus 1089.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 versus 4.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 versus 44.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 492.867 versus 103.884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 versus 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 versus 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4903 versus 2155 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
- 4.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7012 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 562 versus 360
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7012 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 562 versus 360 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8609 | 5939 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 360 | 562 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 52263 | 18068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 | 49.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 | 1089.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 | 4.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 | 44.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 492.867 | 103.884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 | 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 | 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4903 | 2155 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Nom de code | TU116 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2019 | 30 May 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 315 | 515 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Prix maintenant | $449.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.45 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1335 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1140 MHz | 1046 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 128.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.202 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.101 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 64.08 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.2 GTexel/s | 134 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 3,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,333 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 600 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | 224.3 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 7012 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDFireStream 9270
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 480M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 390
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX570A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
IntelArc A380
