NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1140 MHz vs 1046 MHz
Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1335 MHz vs 1085 MHz
956.7x more texture fill rate: 128.2 GTexel/s vs 134 billion / sec
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
3.8x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 230 Watt
3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8609 vs 5939
2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52263 vs 18068
3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.93 vs 49.824
Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1919.95 vs 1089.67
3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.6 vs 4.899
2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.964 vs 44.06
4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 492.867 vs 103.884
Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 vs 7412
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3690
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3340
Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 vs 7412
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3690
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3340
2.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4903 vs 2155

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	23 April 2019 vs 30 May 2013
Core clock speed	1140 MHz vs 1046 MHz
Boost clock speed	1335 MHz vs 1085 MHz
Texture fill rate	128.2 GTexel/s vs 134 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 230 Watt
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	8609 vs 5939
Geekbench - OpenCL	52263 vs 18068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	195.93 vs 49.824
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1919.95 vs 1089.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	14.6 vs 4.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	94.964 vs 44.06
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	492.867 vs 103.884
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12301 vs 7412
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12301 vs 7412
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	4903 vs 2155

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770

4.7x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 562 vs 360

Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed	7012 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	562 vs 360

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

8609

5939

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

360

562

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

52263

18068

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

195.93

49.824

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1919.95

1089.67

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14.6

4.899

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

94.964

44.06

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

492.867

103.884

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12301

7412

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3690

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3340

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12301

7412

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3690

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3340

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

4903

2155

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
PassMark - G3D Mark	8609	5939
PassMark - G2D Mark	360	562
Geekbench - OpenCL	52263	18068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	195.93	49.824
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1919.95	1089.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	14.6	4.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	94.964	44.06
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	492.867	103.884
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12301	7412
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718	3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12301	7412
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718	3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	4903	2155

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Kepler
Code name	TU116	GK104
Launch date	23 April 2019	30 May 2013
Place in performance rating	315	515
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$399
Price now		$449.99
Value for money (0-100)		15.45
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1335 MHz	1085 MHz
Core clock speed	1140 MHz	1046 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	128.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	8.202 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.101 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1536	1536
Pixel fill rate	64.08 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	128.2 GTexel/s	134 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt	230 Watt
Transistor count	6600 million	3,540 million
CUDA cores		1536
Floating-point performance		3,333 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature		98 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		10.5" (26.7 cm)
Minimum recommended system power		600 Watt
Supplementary power connectors		One 8-pin and one 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.3
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	224.3 GB / s
Memory bus width	192 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)	7012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Technologies
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
PhysX
TXAA