NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti versus NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1645 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 33% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 12000 MHz versus 9016 MHz
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 813 versus 698
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 61445 versus 60145
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 208.608 versus 194.277
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2573.643 versus 1916.09
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.886 versus 31.471
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 926.614 versus 545.751
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 February 2019 versus 1 October 2016 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1645 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz versus 9016 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 813 versus 698 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61445 versus 60145 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 versus 194.277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 versus 1916.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 versus 31.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 versus 545.751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3715 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P6000
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 15025 versus 12931
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.951 versus 16.447
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20035 versus 16952
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20035 versus 16952
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8770 versus 6261
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15025 versus 12931 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.951 versus 16.447 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20035 versus 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20035 versus 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8770 versus 6261 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12931 | 15025 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 813 | 698 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61445 | 60145 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | 194.277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | 1916.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | 17.951 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | 31.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | 545.751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 | 20035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 | 20035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6261 | 8770 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Nom de code | TU116 | GP102 |
| Date de sortie | 22 February 2019 | 1 October 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | $5,999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 200 | 218 |
| Prix maintenant | $279.99 | $4,403.52 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 67.32 | 3.90 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1645 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6,600 million | 11,800 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 12,634 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 394.8 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo |
| Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Synchronization de plusieurs écrans | Quadro Sync II | |
| Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 229 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1 x 8-pin |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
| Largeur | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz | 9016 MHz |
| RAM maximale | 24 GB | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | 384 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
| High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4500 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AppleA14 Bionic
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon 780M
