NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1500 MHz versus 1481 MHz
- Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1582 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 9% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 12000 MHz versus 11008 MHz
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 208.608 versus 205.837
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2573.643 versus 2406.499
- 5.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.886 versus 25.833
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 versus 15019
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 versus 15019
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 February 2019 versus 10 March 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz versus 1481 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1582 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz versus 11008 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 versus 205.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 versus 2406.499 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 versus 25.833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 versus 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 versus 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3716 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18558 versus 12931
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 937 versus 813
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 62508 versus 61445
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.591 versus 16.447
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1002.573 versus 926.614
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9870 versus 6260
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18558 versus 12931 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 versus 813 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62508 versus 61445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 versus 16.447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 versus 926.614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9870 versus 6260 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12931 | 18558 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 813 | 937 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61445 | 62508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | 205.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | 2406.499 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | 19.591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | 25.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | 1002.573 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6260 | 9870 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Nom de code | TU116 | GP102 |
Date de sortie | 22 February 2019 | 10 March 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | $699 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 200 | 201 |
Prix maintenant | $279.99 | $826.98 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 67.32 | 27.48 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz | 1481 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6,600 million | 11,800 million |
Performance á point flottant | 11,340 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 91 °C | |
Pipelines | 3584 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 354.4 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 229 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz | 11008 MHz |
RAM maximale | 11 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 484.4 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 352 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |