NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 versus AMD Radeon R9 390X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and AMD Radeon R9 390X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 70% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 275 Watt
- 7.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8004 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11690 versus 9437
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 190.366 versus 114.288
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.492 versus 10.947
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 887.857 versus 683.568
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14998 versus 11675
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14998 versus 11675
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5413 versus 4242
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 14 March 2019 versus 18 June 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 275 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8004 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11690 versus 9437 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.366 versus 114.288 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.492 versus 10.947 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.54 versus 118.411 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 887.857 versus 683.568 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 versus 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 versus 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5413 versus 4242 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 390X
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 820 versus 782
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2911.861 versus 1892.505
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 820 versus 782 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2911.861 versus 1892.505 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | AMD Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11690 | 9437 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 782 | 820 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57152 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.366 | 114.288 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1892.505 | 2911.861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.492 | 10.947 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.54 | 118.411 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 887.857 | 683.568 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 | 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 | 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5413 | 4242 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | AMD Radeon R9 390X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | TU116 | Grenada |
| Date de sortie | 14 March 2019 | 18 June 2015 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $219 | $429 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 241 | 279 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6,600 million | 6,200 million |
| Unités de Compute | 44 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,914 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 2816 | |
| Stream Processors | 2816 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 184.8 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 229 mm | 275 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8004 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 384 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 512 bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4850 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M380
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5500 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X
