NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 48% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1800 MHz versus 1215 MHz
- Environ 85% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 116 Watt versus 215 Watt
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 March 2011 versus 26 March 2010 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1800 MHz versus 1215 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 116 Watt versus 215 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3322 versus 3317 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3322 versus 3317 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
- Environ 18% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 34.0 billion / sec versus 28.8 billion / sec
- 2.3x plus de pipelines: 448 versus 192
- Environ 57% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,088.6 gflops versus 691.2 gflops
- Environ 25% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 1280 MB versus 1 GB
- Environ 63% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1674 MHz (3348 data rate) versus 1026 MHz
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3134 versus 1557
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 414 versus 382
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11089 versus 5750
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.93 versus 18.461
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 980.005 versus 354.392
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.268 versus 1.125
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.309 versus 18.511
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.852 versus 41.941
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3873 versus 2488
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3614 versus 3351
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3873 versus 2488
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3614 versus 3351
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.0 billion / sec versus 28.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 448 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,088.6 gflops versus 691.2 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 1280 MB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1674 MHz (3348 data rate) versus 1026 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3134 versus 1557 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 414 versus 382 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11089 versus 5750 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.93 versus 18.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 980.005 versus 354.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.268 versus 1.125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.309 versus 18.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.852 versus 41.941 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3873 versus 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3614 versus 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3873 versus 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3614 versus 3351 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1557 | 3134 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 382 | 414 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5750 | 11089 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.461 | 27.93 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.392 | 980.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.125 | 3.268 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.511 | 47.309 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 41.941 | 97.852 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2488 | 3873 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3351 | 3614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3322 | 3317 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2488 | 3873 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3351 | 3614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3322 | 3317 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 322 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
Nom de code | GF116 | GF100 |
Date de sortie | 15 March 2011 | 26 March 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | $349 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1019 | 790 |
Prix maintenant | $287.59 | $522.01 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.49 | 6.87 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1800 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | 448 |
Performance á point flottant | 691.2 gflops | 1,088.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 100 °C | 105 °C |
Pipelines | 192 | 448 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 billion / sec | 34.0 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 116 Watt | 215 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,170 million | 3,100 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Connecteurs d’écran | Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI |
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 8.25" (21 cm) | 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm) |
Options SLI | 2-way | 2-way3-way |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | Two 6-pins |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1280 MB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 98.4 GB / s | 133.9 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 320 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1026 MHz | 1674 MHz (3348 data rate) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |