NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 80.6 billion / sec versus 28.8 billion / sec
- 7x plus de pipelines: 1344 versus 192
- 2.9x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,038 gflops versus 691.2 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 16% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 116 Watt
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 75% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1026 MHz
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3239 versus 1553
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9345 versus 5767
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.081 versus 18.461
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 879.575 versus 354.392
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.823 versus 1.125
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.155 versus 18.511
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.75 versus 41.941
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 4 June 2012 versus 15 March 2011 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 80.6 billion / sec versus 28.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1344 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,038 gflops versus 691.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 116 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1026 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3239 versus 1553 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9345 versus 5767 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.081 versus 18.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 879.575 versus 354.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.823 versus 1.125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.155 versus 18.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.75 versus 41.941 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- 2.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1800 MHz versus 720 MHz
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 376 versus 343
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2488 versus 1263
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3351 versus 2409
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3322 versus 3111
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2488 versus 1263
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3351 versus 2409
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3322 versus 3111
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1800 MHz versus 720 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 376 versus 343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2488 versus 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3351 versus 2409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3322 versus 3111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2488 versus 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3351 versus 2409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3322 versus 3111 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3239 | 1553 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 343 | 376 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9345 | 5767 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.081 | 18.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 879.575 | 354.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.823 | 1.125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.155 | 18.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.75 | 41.941 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1263 | 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2409 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3111 | 3322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1263 | 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2409 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3111 | 3322 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 322 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | GK104 | GF116 |
Date de sortie | 4 June 2012 | 15 March 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $310.50 | $149 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1060 | 1061 |
Prix maintenant | $499.99 | $287.59 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 8.46 | 7.49 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 758 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 720 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 1344 | 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,038 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1344 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 80.6 billion / sec | 28.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 116 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 1,170 million |
Température maximale du GPU | 100 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Options SLI | 2-way | 2-way |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 6-pin |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 8.25" (21 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 115.2 GB / s | 98.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1026 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
DSR |