NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 versus AMD Radeon HD 6790
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and AMD Radeon HD 6790 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 22% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 41.0 GTexel / s versus 33.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 25% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 1280 MB versus 1 GB
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.324 versus 12.318
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1181.463 versus 748.068
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.978 versus 1.234
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.37 versus 28.768
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4590 versus 3127
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4590 versus 3127
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 29 November 2011 versus 4 April 2011 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 41.0 GTexel / s versus 33.6 GTexel / s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 1280 MB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.324 versus 12.318 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1181.463 versus 748.068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.978 versus 1.234 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.37 versus 28.768 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.575 versus 121.423 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4590 versus 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4590 versus 3127 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6790
- Environ 15% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 840 MHz versus 732 MHz
- Environ 79% de pipelines plus haut: 800 versus 448
- Environ 2% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,344.0 gflops versus 1,311.7 gflops
- Environ 40% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 210 Watt
- Environ 11% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 4200 MHz versus 3800 MHz
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3534 versus 2133
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 versus 3333
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3534 versus 2133
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 versus 3333
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 840 MHz versus 732 MHz |
| Pipelines | 800 versus 448 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,344.0 gflops versus 1,311.7 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 210 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4200 MHz versus 3800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3534 versus 2133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 versus 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3534 versus 2133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 versus 3333 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6790
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | AMD Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.324 | 12.318 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1181.463 | 748.068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.978 | 1.234 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.37 | 28.768 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.575 | 121.423 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4590 | 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2133 | 3534 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4590 | 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2133 | 3534 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4197 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1616 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 374 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | AMD Radeon HD 6790 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GF110 | Barts |
| Date de sortie | 29 November 2011 | 4 April 2011 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $289 | $149 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 856 | 857 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $64.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 39.40 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 732 MHz | 840 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,311.7 gflops | 1,344.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 448 | 800 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 41.0 GTexel / s | 33.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 210 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 1,700 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 198 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1280 MB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 152.0 GB / s | 134.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 320 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3800 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1450
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6790
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8790M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
AMDFirePro M6100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8650D IGP
