NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti versus AMD Radeon HD 6870
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti and AMD Radeon HD 6870 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 5% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 52.7 GTexel / s versus 50.4 GTexel / s
- 3.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4008 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3059 versus 2209
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 435 versus 416
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 10725 versus 4950
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.935 versus 16.41
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.344 versus 1.346
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 25 January 2011 versus 21 October 2010 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.7 GTexel / s versus 50.4 GTexel / s |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4008 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3059 versus 2209 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 435 versus 416 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10725 versus 4950 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.935 versus 16.41 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.344 versus 1.346 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6870
- 2.9x plus de pipelines: 1120 versus 384
- Environ 60% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,016.0 gflops versus 1,263.4 gflops
- Environ 13% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 151 Watt versus 170 Watt
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 857.798 versus 539.966
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.514 versus 35.841
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.41 versus 64.308
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4238 versus 4184
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 versus 3683
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4238 versus 4184
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 versus 3683
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 1120 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,016.0 gflops versus 1,263.4 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 151 Watt versus 170 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 857.798 versus 539.966 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.514 versus 35.841 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.41 versus 64.308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4238 versus 4184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 versus 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4238 versus 4184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 versus 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 3333 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6870
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 6870 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3059 | 2209 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 435 | 416 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10725 | 4950 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.935 | 16.41 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 539.966 | 857.798 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.344 | 1.346 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.841 | 45.514 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 64.308 | 184.41 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4184 | 4238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4184 | 4238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3349 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 389 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 6870 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GF114 | Barts |
| Date de sortie | 25 January 2011 | 21 October 2010 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $249 | $239 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 815 | 817 |
| Prix maintenant | $138 | $89.99 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.88 | 38.38 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 823 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,263.4 gflops | 2,016.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1120 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.7 GTexel / s | 50.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 151 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,950 million | 1,700 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 900 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 229 mm | 220 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 128.3 GB / s | 134.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4008 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti vs
AMDRadeon HD 6870
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti vs
AMDRadeon HD 7450M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce 825M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti vs
IntelUHD Graphics 770
