NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 versus ATI Radeon HD 5850
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 and ATI Radeon HD 5850 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 725 MHz
- Environ 1% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 151 Watt
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2774 versus 1966
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 434 versus 411
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.82 versus 16.467
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.201 versus 1.541
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 17 May 2011 versus 30 September 2009 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 725 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 151 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2774 versus 1966 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 434 versus 411 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.82 versus 16.467 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.201 versus 1.541 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5850
- Environ 15% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 52.2 GTexel / s versus 45.4 GTexel / s
- 4.3x plus de pipelines: 1440 versus 336
- Environ 92% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,088.0 gflops versus 1,088.6 gflops
- 3.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 33977 versus 8699
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1109.612 versus 623.187
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.08 versus 30.402
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3806 versus 3754
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3667
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3332
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3806 versus 3754
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3667
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3332
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.2 GTexel / s versus 45.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1440 versus 336 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,088.0 gflops versus 1,088.6 gflops |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33977 versus 8699 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1109.612 versus 623.187 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.08 versus 30.402 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3806 versus 3754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3806 versus 3754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3332 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5850
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 | ATI Radeon HD 5850 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2774 | 1966 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 434 | 411 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8699 | 33977 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.82 | 16.467 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 623.187 | 1109.612 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.201 | 1.541 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.402 | 42.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.233 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3754 | 3806 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3667 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3754 | 3806 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3667 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 | ATI Radeon HD 5850 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GF114 | Cypress |
| Date de sortie | 17 May 2011 | 30 September 2009 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | $299 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 855 | 751 |
| Prix maintenant | $353.59 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.61 | |
| Conception | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,088.6 gflops | 2,088.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 99 °C | |
| Pipelines | 336 | 1440 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 45.4 GTexel / s | 52.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 151 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,950 million | 2,154 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 725 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 8.25" (21 cm) | 241 mm |
| Options SLI | 2-Way | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 128.0 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 vs
ATIRadeon X1600 XT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 vs
ATIFirePro V5800
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6790
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 vs
NVIDIAP106-090
