NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost versus ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 96% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 500 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 62.7 billion / sec versus 20 GTexel / s
- Environ 98% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,585 gflops versus 800.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 4.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3368 versus 763
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 461 versus 403
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.21 versus 7.457
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 561.43 versus 512.081
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3426 versus 1643
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3642 versus 3314
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3426 versus 1643
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3642 versus 3314
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 26 March 2013 versus 7 January 2010 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 500 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 62.7 billion / sec versus 20 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,585 gflops versus 800.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3368 versus 763 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 461 versus 403 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.21 versus 7.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 561.43 versus 512.081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3426 versus 1643 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 versus 3314 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3426 versus 1643 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 versus 3314 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Environ 4% de pipelines plus haut: 800 versus 768
- 4.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 134 Watt
- 666.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 3242
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 3242
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 800 versus 768 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 134 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3242 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3242 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3368 | 763 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 461 | 403 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9549 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.21 | 7.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 561.43 | 512.081 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.026 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.868 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.009 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3426 | 1643 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 | 3314 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3242 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3426 | 1643 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 | 3314 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3242 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1106 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GK106 | Broadway |
| Date de sortie | 26 March 2013 | 7 January 2010 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $169 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 844 | 847 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1033 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,585 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 800 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 62.7 billion / sec | 20 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 134 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 1,040 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | No outputs |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 144.2 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6.0 GB/s | 4000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| HDMI 1.3a | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5850
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDFirePro V7900
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDRadeon HD 8210E
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDRadeon R7 350X OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
NVIDIAQuadro M1000M
