NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 823 MHz
- Environ 16% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1033 MHz versus 888 MHz
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 2 GB versus 1536 MB
| Date de sortie | 26 March 2013 versus 22 August 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 823 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1033 MHz versus 888 MHz |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1536 MB |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
- Environ 36% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 85.25 GTexel / s versus 62.7 billion / sec
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 1152 versus 768
- Environ 29% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,046 gflops versus 1,585 gflops
- Environ 3% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 130 Watt versus 134 Watt
- 933.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5600 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 32.718 versus 25.21
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1021.371 versus 561.43
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.143 versus 2.026
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 56.509 versus 30.868
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 67.697 versus 51.009
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5983 versus 3426
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3665 versus 3642
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 versus 3242
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5983 versus 3426
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3665 versus 3642
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 versus 3242
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 85.25 GTexel / s versus 62.7 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 1152 versus 768 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,046 gflops versus 1,585 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt versus 134 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5600 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.718 versus 25.21 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1021.371 versus 561.43 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.143 versus 2.026 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 56.509 versus 30.868 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.697 versus 51.009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5983 versus 3426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3665 versus 3642 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 versus 3242 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5983 versus 3426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3665 versus 3642 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 versus 3242 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3351 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 460 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9566 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.21 | 32.718 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 561.43 | 1021.371 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.026 | 3.143 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.868 | 56.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.009 | 67.697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3426 | 5983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 | 3665 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3242 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3426 | 5983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 | 3665 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3242 | 3325 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1106 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GK106 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 26 March 2013 | 22 August 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $169 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 836 | 839 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1033 MHz | 888 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,585 gflops | 2,046 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1152 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 62.7 billion / sec | 85.25 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 134 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 241 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 144.2 GB / s | 134.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6.0 GB/s | 5600 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDRadeon HD 7790
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDRadeon HD 8210E
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDRadeon R7 350X OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDFirePro S9300 X2
