NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 versus AMD Radeon HD 8870M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and AMD Radeon HD 8870M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 41% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1020 MHz versus 725 MHz
- Environ 50% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1085 MHz versus 725 MHz
- Environ 12% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 34.72 GTexel / s versus 31 GTexel / s
- Environ 12% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,111 gflops versus 992.0 gflops
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3337 versus 1638
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9306 versus 8804
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.239 versus 24.097
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 639.427 versus 465.496
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.341 versus 2.211
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 versus 1 April 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz versus 725 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz versus 725 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.72 GTexel / s versus 31 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,111 gflops versus 992.0 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3337 versus 1638 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9306 versus 8804 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 versus 24.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 versus 465.496 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 versus 2.211 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 versus 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 versus 3702 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8870M
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 512
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 900x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4500 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 629 versus 515
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.126 versus 32
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 106.848 versus 69.814
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 512 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 629 versus 515 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.126 versus 32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 106.848 versus 69.814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3346 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8870M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | AMD Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3337 | 1638 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 | 629 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9306 | 8804 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 | 24.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 | 465.496 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 | 2.211 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 | 38.126 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 | 106.848 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1050 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | AMD Radeon HD 8870M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GM107 | Venus |
| Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 | 1 April 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $119 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 724 | 726 |
| Prix maintenant | $150.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.54 | |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 512 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,111 gflops | 992.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.72 GTexel / s | 31 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
| Unités de Compute | 10 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | No outputs |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5.0 GB/s | 4500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
ATIFireGL V5100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6150
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1800
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8870M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M
