NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 17% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 109.8 GTexel / s versus 94.1 billion / sec
- Environ 17% de pipelines plus haut: 1344 versus 1152
- Environ 11% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,634 gflops versus 2,378 gflops
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5328 versus 4803
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 575 versus 532
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 14380 versus 14261
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.336 versus 37.505
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1351.496 versus 864.402
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.121 versus 3.09
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.14 versus 40.457
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 156.419 versus 84.186
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 September 2013 versus 25 June 2013 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 109.8 GTexel / s versus 94.1 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1344 versus 1152 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,634 gflops versus 2,378 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5328 versus 4803 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 575 versus 532 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14380 versus 14261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.336 versus 37.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1351.496 versus 864.402 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.121 versus 3.09 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.14 versus 40.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 156.419 versus 84.186 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 915 MHz
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1033 MHz versus 980 MHz
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 915 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1033 MHz versus 980 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3716 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5328 | 4803 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 575 | 532 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14380 | 14261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.336 | 37.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1351.496 | 864.402 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.121 | 3.09 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.14 | 40.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 156.419 | 84.186 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1659 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Nom de code | GK104 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 27 September 2013 | 25 June 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 575 | 576 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $249 | |
Prix maintenant | $249.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.69 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 980 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 915 MHz | 980 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2,634 gflops | 2,378 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1344 | 1152 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 109.8 GTexel / s | 94.1 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 170 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1152 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | Two 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 500 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.3 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
PhysX | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |