NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M versus Intel HD Graphics 4600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M and Intel HD Graphics 4600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 36.08 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s
- 32x plus de pipelines: 640 versus 20
- 23.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,155 gflops versus 50 gflops
- 4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2521 versus 630
- 3.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9809 versus 3210
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.761 versus 8.844
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 388.248 versus 171.17
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.428 versus 1.115
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.889 versus 10.385
- 12.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.016 versus 12.361
- 3.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3817 versus 988
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 versus 1702
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 2808
- 3.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3817 versus 988
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 versus 1702
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 2808
- 5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 979 versus 194
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 versus 3 June 2013 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 36.08 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 20 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,155 gflops versus 50 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2521 versus 630 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9809 versus 3210 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 versus 8.844 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 versus 171.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 versus 1.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 versus 10.385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 versus 12.361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 versus 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 versus 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 versus 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 versus 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 2808 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 versus 194 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 versus 225
| Caractéristiques | |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 versus 225 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2521 | 630 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | 314 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9809 | 3210 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 | 8.844 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 | 171.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 | 1.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 | 10.385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 | 12.361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 | 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 | 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 2808 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 | 194 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 7.5 |
| Nom de code | GM107 | Haswell GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 | 3 June 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 896 | 1359 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,155 gflops | 50 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 20 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 36.08 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 392 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 400 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 1 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GS AGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
ATIRadeon HD 3300 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375X
