NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M versus ATI FirePro V8800
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M and ATI FirePro V8800 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 14% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 941 MHz versus 825 MHz
- Environ 64% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 108.3 GTexel / s versus 66.0 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 208 Watt
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 3 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3496 versus 2281
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.836 versus 18.27
- 8.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.038 versus 0.357
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 59.57 versus 49.357
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3575
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3575
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 versus 7 April 2010 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 941 MHz versus 825 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 108.3 GTexel / s versus 66.0 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 208 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 3 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3496 versus 2281 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.836 versus 18.27 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.038 versus 0.357 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.57 versus 49.357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3575 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI FirePro V8800
- Environ 19% de pipelines plus haut: 1600 versus 1344
- Environ 2% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,640.0 gflops versus 2,599 gflops
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 445 versus 279
- 2.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 36751 versus 12758
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1180.667 versus 960.114
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 228.843 versus 81.753
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 1600 versus 1344 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,640.0 gflops versus 2,599 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 445 versus 279 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36751 versus 12758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1180.667 versus 960.114 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 228.843 versus 81.753 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3353 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V8800
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | ATI FirePro V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3496 | 2281 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 279 | 445 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12758 | 36751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.836 | 18.27 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 960.114 | 1180.667 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.038 | 0.357 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.57 | 49.357 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.753 | 228.843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6350 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6350 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1336 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | ATI FirePro V8800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GK104 | Cypress |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 | 7 April 2010 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 691 | 693 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 967 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 941 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1344 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,599 gflops | 2,640.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1344 | 1600 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 108.3 GTexel / s | 66.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 208 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 2,154 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 3 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 120.0 GB / s | 147.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
ATIMobility Radeon X2300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3850
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
ATIFirePro V8800
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
NVIDIAQuadro 7000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
NVIDIATesla K80m
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
AMDRadeon E8950
