NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 3 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 108.3 GTexel / s versus 43.9 billion / sec
- 2.8x plus de pipelines: 1344 versus 480
- Environ 85% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,599 gflops versus 1,405.4 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 219 Watt
- 2.4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 3 GB versus 1280 MB
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 960.114 versus 736.185
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 59.57 versus 40.08
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6350 versus 4862
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3668
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 3325
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6350 versus 4862
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3668
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 3325
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 versus 7 December 2010 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 108.3 GTexel / s versus 43.9 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1344 versus 480 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,599 gflops versus 1,405.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 219 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 3 GB versus 1280 MB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 960.114 versus 736.185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.57 versus 40.08 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6350 versus 4862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6350 versus 4862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3325 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
- Environ 56% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1464 MHz versus 941 MHz
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3929 versus 3450
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 471 versus 276
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 13266 versus 12622
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.849 versus 34.836
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.369 versus 3.038
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 122.953 versus 81.753
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1464 MHz versus 941 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3929 versus 3450 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 471 versus 276 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13266 versus 12622 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.849 versus 34.836 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.369 versus 3.038 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 122.953 versus 81.753 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3450 | 3929 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 276 | 471 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12622 | 13266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.836 | 36.849 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 960.114 | 736.185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.038 | 4.369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.57 | 40.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.753 | 122.953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6350 | 4862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6350 | 4862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3325 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1336 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | GK104 | GF110 |
Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 | 7 December 2010 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 733 | 734 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $349 | |
Prix maintenant | $99.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 48.11 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 967 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 941 MHz | 1464 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 1344 | 480 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,599 gflops | 1,405.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1344 | 480 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 108.3 GTexel / s | 43.9 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 219 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | Two 6-pin |
Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Options SLI | 3-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 3 GB | 1280 MB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 120.0 GB / s | 152.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 320 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Vision | ||
DSR | ||
Surround |