NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1188 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- Environ 13% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 49.2 billion / sec versus 43.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 768 versus 640
- Environ 31% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,825 gflops versus 1,389 gflops
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5345 versus 3465
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 642 versus 312
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 16715 versus 12495
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 60.473 versus 49.772
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.279 versus 3.67
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 231.508 versus 179.567
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6803 versus 5157
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6803 versus 5157
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 20 August 2015 versus 13 March 2015 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1188 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 49.2 billion / sec versus 43.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 versus 640 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,825 gflops versus 1,389 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5345 versus 3465 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 642 versus 312 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16715 versus 12495 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 60.473 versus 49.772 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 758.865 versus 757.295 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.279 versus 3.67 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 231.508 versus 179.567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6803 versus 5157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6803 versus 5157 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
- Environ 20% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 90 Watt
- 835.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 6.6 GB/s
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.875 versus 29.738
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5834 versus 3697
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7859 versus 3356
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5834 versus 3697
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7859 versus 3356
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz versus 1024 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 90 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 6.6 GB/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.875 versus 29.738 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5834 versus 3697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7859 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5834 versus 3697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7859 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5345 | 3465 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 642 | 312 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16715 | 12495 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 60.473 | 49.772 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 758.865 | 757.295 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.279 | 3.67 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.738 | 49.875 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 231.508 | 179.567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6803 | 5157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 | 5834 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 7859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6803 | 5157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 | 5834 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 7859 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 104 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
Nom de code | GM206 | GM107 |
Date de sortie | 20 August 2015 | 13 March 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $159 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 551 | 554 |
Prix maintenant | $194.44 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 30.06 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1188 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1024 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,825 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 49.2 billion / sec | 43.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,940 million | 1,870 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | No outputs |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Longeur | 7.938" (20.2 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Options SLI | 2x | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pins | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 105.6 GB / s | 80.19 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6.6 GB/s | 5012 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |