NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti versus AMD Radeon R9 M390X

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti and AMD Radeon R9 M390X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

versus

AMD Radeon R9 M390X

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Environ 38% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1000 MHz versus 723 MHz
Environ 90% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 176 billion / sec versus 92.54 GTexel / s
Environ 38% de pipelines plus haut: 2816 versus 2048
2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 6,060 gflops versus 2,961 gflops
Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 6 GB versus 4 GB
3.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13783 versus 3851
Environ 75% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 853 versus 487
Environ 95% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 42988 versus 22044
2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 145.843 versus 64.199
Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1722.98 versus 1284.053
Environ 98% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.661 versus 5.881
2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 788.464 versus 312.822
Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10471 versus 6508
Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10471 versus 6508

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	1000 MHz versus 723 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	176 billion / sec versus 92.54 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2816 versus 2048
Performance á point flottant	6,060 gflops versus 2,961 gflops
Taille de mémore maximale	6 GB versus 4 GB
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	13783 versus 3851
PassMark - G2D Mark	853 versus 487
Geekbench - OpenCL	42988 versus 22044
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	145.843 versus 64.199
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1722.98 versus 1284.053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	11.661 versus 5.881
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	788.464 versus 312.822
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10471 versus 6508
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10471 versus 6508

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M390X

3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 250 Watt
2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 78.169 versus 37.16
2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8593 versus 3695
7.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 24690 versus 3338
2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8593 versus 3695
7.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 24690 versus 3338

Caractéristiques
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt versus 250 Watt
Référence
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	78.169 versus 37.16
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8593 versus 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	24690 versus 3338
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8593 versus 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	24690 versus 3338

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M390X

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

13783

3851

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

853

487

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

42988

22044

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

145.843

64.199

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1722.98

1284.053

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11.661

5.881

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

37.16

78.169

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

788.464

312.822

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10471

6508

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3695

8593

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3338

24690

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10471

6508

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3695

8593

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3338

24690

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti	AMD Radeon R9 M390X
PassMark - G3D Mark	13783	3851
PassMark - G2D Mark	853	487
Geekbench - OpenCL	42988	22044
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	145.843	64.199
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1722.98	1284.053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	11.661	5.881
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	37.16	78.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	788.464	312.822
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10471	6508
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3695	8593
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3338	24690
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10471	6508
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3695	8593
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3338	24690
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1320

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti	AMD Radeon R9 M390X
Essentiel
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 3.0
Nom de code	GM200	Amethyst
Date de sortie	2 June 2015	5 May 2015
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$649
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	312	311
Prix maintenant	$679.99
Genre	Desktop	Desktop
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)	23.43
Conception		AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1075 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	1000 MHz	723 MHz
Noyaux CUDA	2816
Performance á point flottant	6,060 gflops	2,961 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	2816	2048
Taux de remplissage de la texture	176 billion / sec	92.54 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	250 Watt	75 Watt
Compte de transistor	8,000 million	5,000 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI	Internal
Connecteurs d’écran	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2	No outputs
Soutien de G-SYNC
HDCP
Résolution VGA maximale	2048x1536
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs
Eyefinity
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Soutien de bus	PCI Express 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Hauteur	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Longeur	10.5" (26.7 cm)
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU)	600 Watt
Options SLI	4x
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	6-pin + 8-pin	None
Taille du laptop		large
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Mantle
OpenCL		Not Listed
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	6 GB	4 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	336.5 GB / s	160.0 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	384 Bit	256 bit
Vitesse de mémoire	7.0 GB/s
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	GDDR5
Mémoire partagé	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision
Adaptive Vertical Sync
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
SLI
Surround
AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Graphiques changeables
ZeroCore