NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs AMD Radeon R9 M390X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti and AMD Radeon R9 M390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 723 MHz
- Around 90% higher texture fill rate: 176 billion / sec vs 92.54 GTexel / s
- Around 38% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2048
- 2x better floating-point performance: 6,060 gflops vs 2,961 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13783 vs 3851
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 853 vs 487
- Around 95% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42988 vs 22044
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 145.843 vs 64.199
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1722.98 vs 1284.053
- Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.661 vs 5.881
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 788.464 vs 312.822
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10471 vs 6508
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10471 vs 6508
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 723 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 176 billion / sec vs 92.54 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2816 vs 2048 |
| Floating-point performance | 6,060 gflops vs 2,961 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13783 vs 3851 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 853 vs 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 42988 vs 22044 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 145.843 vs 64.199 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.98 vs 1284.053 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.661 vs 5.881 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 788.464 vs 312.822 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10471 vs 6508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10471 vs 6508 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M390X
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 78.169 vs 37.16
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8593 vs 3695
- 7.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 24690 vs 3338
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8593 vs 3695
- 7.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 24690 vs 3338
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.169 vs 37.16 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8593 vs 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 24690 vs 3338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8593 vs 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 24690 vs 3338 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M390X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | AMD Radeon R9 M390X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13783 | 3851 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 853 | 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 42988 | 22044 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 145.843 | 64.199 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.98 | 1284.053 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.661 | 5.881 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.16 | 78.169 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 788.464 | 312.822 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10471 | 6508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 8593 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 | 24690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10471 | 6508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 8593 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 | 24690 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1320 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | AMD Radeon R9 M390X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | GM200 | Amethyst |
| Launch date | 2 June 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
| Place in performance rating | 312 | 311 |
| Price now | $679.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 23.43 | |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1075 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 723 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 2816 | |
| Floating-point performance | 6,060 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2816 | 2048 |
| Texture fill rate | 176 billion / sec | 92.54 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 8,000 million | 5,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| SLI options | 4x | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin + 8-pin | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 336.5 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 M390X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 380X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 Ti vs
NVIDIAP102-100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX570A
