NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK versus AMD FirePro W8000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK and AMD FirePro W8000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 213 billion / sec versus 100.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 61% de pipelines plus haut: 2880 versus 1792
- Environ 75% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 5,645 gflops versus 3,226 gflops
- Environ 40% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 350 Watt
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 6 GB versus 4 GB
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9004 versus 4164
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 588 versus 528
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 27076 versus 24518
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 72.677 versus 64.628
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8721 versus 7400
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8721 versus 7400
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 versus 14 June 2012 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 213 billion / sec versus 100.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2880 versus 1792 |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,645 gflops versus 3,226 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 350 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9004 versus 4164 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 588 versus 528 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27076 versus 24518 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.677 versus 64.628 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8721 versus 7400 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8721 versus 7400 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W8000
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 900 MHz versus 889 MHz
- 785.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5500 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 387.109 versus 290.861
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3679
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3679
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz versus 889 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5500 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 387.109 versus 290.861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3353 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W8000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK | AMD FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9004 | 4164 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 588 | 528 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27076 | 24518 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.677 | 64.628 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1293.474 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.988 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 22.384 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 290.861 | 387.109 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8721 | 7400 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8721 | 7400 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3095 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK | AMD FirePro W8000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GK110B | Tahiti |
| Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 | 14 June 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | $1,599 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 438 | 441 |
| Prix maintenant | $999.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.82 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 980 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 889 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2880 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,645 gflops | 3,226 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2880 | 1792 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 213 billion / sec | 100.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 7,080 million | 4,313 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Compte DisplayPort | 4 | |
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 279 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 336 GB / s | 176 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7.0 GB/s | 5500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4350
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 560v
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs
AMDFirePro W8000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs
AMDRadeon R9 270X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs
AMDRadeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs
AMDFirePro W4300
