NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z versus AMD FirePro W9000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z and AMD FirePro W9000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 338 billion / sec versus 124.8 GTexel / s
- 2.8x plus de pipelines: 2x 2880 versus 2048
- 2.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 5,046 gflops versus 3,994 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8905 versus 6138
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 28 May 2014 versus 14 June 2012 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 338 billion / sec versus 124.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 2880 versus 2048 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 5,046 gflops versus 3,994 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 6 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8905 versus 6138 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W9000
- Environ 38% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 975 MHz versus 705 MHz
- Environ 7% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 350 Watt versus 375 Watt
- 785.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5500 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 720 versus 639
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 31775 versus 22732
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 84.462 versus 66.419
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1734.394 versus 1261.593
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.988 versus 7.89
- 4.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 86.984 versus 17.882
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 460.234 versus 309.857
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 975 MHz versus 705 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt versus 375 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5500 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 720 versus 639 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 31775 versus 22732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 84.462 versus 66.419 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1734.394 versus 1261.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.988 versus 7.89 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.984 versus 17.882 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 460.234 versus 309.857 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z | AMD FirePro W9000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8905 | 6138 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 639 | 720 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22732 | 31775 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 66.419 | 84.462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1261.593 | 1734.394 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.89 | 8.988 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.882 | 86.984 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 309.857 | 460.234 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8124 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2413 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2226 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8124 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2413 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2226 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17055 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z | AMD FirePro W9000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GK110B | Tahiti |
| Date de sortie | 28 May 2014 | 14 June 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,999 | $3,999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 340 | 342 |
| Prix maintenant | $1,580 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 6.46 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 876 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 705 MHz | 975 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 5760 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 5,046 gflops | 3,994 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2x 2880 | 2048 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 338 billion / sec | 124.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 375 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 7,080 million | 4,313 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 279 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 12 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 672 GB / s | 264 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7.0 GB/s | 5500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Z vs
AMDFirePro W9000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Z vs
AMDRadeon HD 7970 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Z vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Z vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Z vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Z vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
