NVIDIA GeForce MX150 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 22% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 937 MHz versus 771 MHz
- Environ 30% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1038 MHz versus 797 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 12.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 122 Watt
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 45.905 versus 33.184
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 145.794 versus 126.579
- 37x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 versus 117
- 34.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 versus 108.2
- 28x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 119.7
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 versus 8 November 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 937 MHz versus 771 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1038 MHz versus 797 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 122 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 5000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 versus 33.184 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 versus 126.579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 versus 117 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 versus 108.2 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 119.7 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 102.0 GTexel / s versus 46.98 GTexel / s
- 4x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 384
- 2.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,448 gflops versus 1,127 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1002.196 versus 495.238
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.261 versus 2.365
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.752 versus 38.965
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6912 versus 4330
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6710 versus 3710
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6703 versus 3356
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.0 GTexel / s versus 46.98 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,448 gflops versus 1,127 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1002.196 versus 495.238 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.261 versus 2.365 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.752 versus 38.965 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6912 versus 4330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6710 versus 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6703 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2271 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 214 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9582 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 | 33.184 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | 1002.196 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | 3.261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | 54.752 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 | 126.579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 | 6912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 6710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 6703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 | 117 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 108.2 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 119.7 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 994 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GP108 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 | 8 November 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 913 | 915 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1038 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 937 MHz | 771 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,127 gflops | 2,448 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.98 GTexel / s | 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,800 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 48.06 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce MX150 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
NVIDIAQuadro4 900 XGL
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
AMDFirePro W600
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760A
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
NVIDIAP106-090
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX110
