NVIDIA GeForce MX230 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX230 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX230
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 88% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1519 MHz versus 810 MHz
- Environ 14% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 336
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 15x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 50% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 4000 MHz
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.43 versus 30.402
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 102.234 versus 62.233
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 versus 3667
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 3332
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 versus 3667
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 3332
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 versus 17 May 2011 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1519 MHz versus 810 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 336 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 150 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 4000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.43 versus 30.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 102.234 versus 62.233 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 versus 3667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 versus 3667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3332 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2774 versus 1830
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 434 versus 214
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8699 versus 6740
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.82 versus 21.591
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 623.187 versus 445.82
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.201 versus 1.736
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3754 versus 2680
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3754 versus 2680
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2774 versus 1830 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 434 versus 214 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8699 versus 6740 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.82 versus 21.591 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 623.187 versus 445.82 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.201 versus 1.736 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3754 versus 2680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3754 versus 2680 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1830 | 2774 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 214 | 434 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6740 | 8699 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.591 | 25.82 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 445.82 | 623.187 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.736 | 2.201 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.43 | 30.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 102.234 | 62.233 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2680 | 3754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | 3667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2680 | 3754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | 3667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3332 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GP108 | GF114 |
| Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 | 17 May 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 981 | 855 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Prix maintenant | $353.59 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.61 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1519 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 336 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,800 million | 1,950 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,088.6 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 99 °C | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 45.4 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | Two 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 8.25" (21 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 2-Way | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.1 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 128.0 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce MX230 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
ATIRadeon HD 2400 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 745 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
AMDRadeon R8 M445DX
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P400
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile
