NVIDIA GeForce MX330 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX330 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX330
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 40% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1531 MHz versus 1096 MHz
- Environ 36% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1594 MHz versus 1176 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 38.26 GTexel/s versus 47.04 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 7.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 75 Watt
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 versus 13 March 2015 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1531 MHz versus 1096 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1594 MHz versus 1176 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 38.26 GTexel/s versus 47.04 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 384
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 66% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2500 MHz versus 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective)
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 10898 versus 10840
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 246 versus 229
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3383 versus 2433
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 versus 2784
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 versus 2784
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5264 versus 3808
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5264 versus 3808
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 384 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz versus 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10898 versus 10840 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 246 versus 229 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3383 versus 2433 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 2784 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 2784 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5264 versus 3808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5264 versus 3808 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX330
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10840 | 10898 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 229 | 246 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 | 3383 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2784 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2784 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3808 | 5264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3808 | 5264 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.294 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 795.325 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.692 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.794 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.513 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1231 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | GP108 | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 | 13 March 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 770 | 773 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1594 MHz | 1176 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1531 MHz | 1096 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 38.26 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.13 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,224 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 25.50 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 38.26 GTexel/s | 47.04 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1800 million | 1,870 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,505 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Largeur | IGP | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 48.06 GB/s | 80 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) | 2500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce MX330 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4550
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4650
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
AMDRadeon E8950
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop)
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 750
