NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 80 Watt versus 200 Watt
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 29 January 2019 versus 13 August 2018 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt versus 200 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 versus 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 versus 3719 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Environ 69% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 960 MHz
- Environ 51% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10685 versus 5905
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 749 versus 540
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16063 versus 11355
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 versus 17150
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 versus 17150
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz versus 960 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Référence | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 versus 5905 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 versus 540 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16063 versus 11355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 versus 17150 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 versus 17150 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5905 | 10685 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 540 | 749 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11355 | 16063 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17150 | 19811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17150 | 19811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3358 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 226.447 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.476 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.544 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1106.12 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU106B | TU104 |
| Date de sortie | 29 January 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 205 | 154 |
| Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 62.74 | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,299 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1815 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 960 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 1920 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10,800 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGRID M10-8Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs
AppleA14 Bionic
