NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 37% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1365 MHz versus 993 MHz
- 5x plus de pipelines: 1920 versus 384
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 6x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 1 GB
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- 9.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14119 versus 1469
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 746 versus 349
- 16.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 71402 versus 4271
- 18.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 217.04 versus 11.994
- 10.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3119.736 versus 291.627
- 21.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.707 versus 1.023
- 8.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 133.975 versus 15.139
- 48.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1141.283 versus 23.651
- 11.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 versus 1790
- 5.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 versus 1427
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 versus 2153
- 11.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 versus 1790
- 5.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 versus 1427
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 versus 2153
- 2.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1242 versus 513
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 January 2019 versus 29 May 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz versus 993 MHz |
Pipelines | 1920 versus 384 |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14119 versus 1469 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 746 versus 349 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71402 versus 4271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.04 versus 11.994 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 versus 291.627 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.707 versus 1.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.975 versus 15.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 versus 23.651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 versus 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 versus 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 versus 2153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 versus 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 versus 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 versus 2153 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1242 versus 513 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 64 Watt versus 160 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt versus 160 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14119 | 1469 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 746 | 349 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71402 | 4271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.04 | 11.994 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 | 291.627 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.707 | 1.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.975 | 15.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 | 23.651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 | 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 | 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 | 2153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 | 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 | 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 | 2153 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1242 | 513 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
Nom de code | TU106 | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 7 January 2019 | 29 May 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $349 | $89 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 161 | 1270 |
Prix maintenant | $349.99 | $94.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 62.74 | 18.87 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz | 993 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1920 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 64 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10,800 million | 1,270 million |
Performance á point flottant | 762.6 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31.78 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 229 mm | 145 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | 1 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.19 GB / s |