NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1365 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1680 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Environ 56% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 160 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 versus 3718
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 versus 3358
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 versus 3718
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 versus 3358
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 January 2019 versus 20 September 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 versus 3358 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 21785 versus 14151
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 935 versus 750
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 138583 versus 70668
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 394.035 versus 220.337
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5461.22 versus 3131.344
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.133 versus 21.852
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 173.697 versus 135.923
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1987.605 versus 1141.283
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23659 versus 20094
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23659 versus 20094
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 14606 versus 7489
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21785 versus 14151 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 935 versus 750 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138583 versus 70668 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 versus 220.337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 versus 3131.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.133 versus 21.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.697 versus 135.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 versus 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 versus 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 versus 20094 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14606 versus 7489 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14151 | 21785 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 | 935 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70668 | 138583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.337 | 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3131.344 | 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.852 | 41.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.923 | 173.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 | 1987.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7489 | 14606 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU106 | TU102 |
Date de sortie | 7 January 2019 | 20 September 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $349 | $999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 150 | 83 |
Prix maintenant | $349.99 | $1,279.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 62.74 | 17.22 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 1920 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10,800 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 229 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 |